Live coding
Clarify the problem, choose a data structure, implement cleanly, test aloud, and improve complexity.
Algorithms · data structures · testingFree readiness lab
Algorithms still matter—but engineering teams also evaluate how you debug, design, communicate tradeoffs, explain past impact, and use modern tools with judgment.
What teams evaluate
A strong candidate does more than reach an answer. They make their reasoning observable, test assumptions, and respond well when the problem changes.
Clarify the problem, choose a data structure, implement cleanly, test aloud, and improve complexity.
Algorithms · data structures · testingRead unfamiliar code, form hypotheses, isolate the defect, explain risk, and propose a maintainable fix.
Diagnosis · code quality · collaborationMove from requirements to interfaces, data models, scale, failure modes, observability, and tradeoffs.
Architecture · reliability · judgmentTell evidence-rich stories about ownership, conflict, decisions, failures, learning, and measurable results.
Leadership · communication · reflectionDefend what you built: constraints, alternatives, your contribution, the hardest failure, and what changed afterward.
Depth · credibility · product thinkingWhen tools are allowed, show that you can verify output, protect data, catch subtle errors, and remain accountable.
Verification · security · responsible useOfficial company signals
This comparison is distilled from public company interview guidance. Follow the source links and your recruiter's instructions for the current role.
| Company | Publicly emphasized formats | Preparation focus | Official guide |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon | Online assessment, technical interviews, behavioral evaluation | Coding, system design where relevant, Leadership Principles | Amazon Jobs ↗ |
| Meta | Coding, design, behavioral conversations | Problem solving, system/product design, impact stories | Meta Careers ↗ |
| Microsoft | Technical problem solving and role-related discussion | Design, coding, testing, technical depth, past experience | Microsoft Careers ↗ |
| OpenAI | Role-dependent skills assessments and structured interviews | Deep role skills, collaboration, mission and values | OpenAI guide ↗ |
| Anthropic | Live coding for technical roles plus experience and motivation discussions | Technical fluency, clear thinking, mission context, candidate questions | Anthropic Careers ↗ |
Six-module course map
Use the diagnostic to choose a starting point, then move through a repeatable cycle: learn the rubric, attempt under constraints, review the evidence, and repeat.
Find my starting moduleClarification, examples, solution search, implementation, testing, and complexity.
Hypothesis trees, log reading, code review, risk assessment, and concise fixes.
APIs, data, scale, reliability, security, observability, and explicit tradeoffs.
Situation, decision, action, measurable result, conflict, failure, and learning.
Architecture narrative, personal contribution, alternatives, incidents, and outcomes.
Tool policy, prompt intent, verification, privacy, attribution, and final accountability.
Private readiness diagnostic
Rate your current confidence. Answers stay in this browser and generate a focused two-week starting plan.